Reflection

    In my annotation 1 and annotation 2, the resource which I use to support my point is not clear enough. I didn't find the information about the author. So I can't assure that the source is dependable and credible. And in my annotation 2, the digital data of my source is opposite to my partner. Under the same condition, different points will lead to different outcomes. It's an interesting result. Therefore, in my annotation 3, I would like to compare my result and my partner's. And I will find foreign source. Premarital cohabitation is an open issue for Chinese people. So many elder people are opposed to it. Younger people think it a scandal. However, western people such as American and European are much more liberal about it. I wonder whether they have different ideas on this issue. And in my annotation 4, I will find foreign essay. I want to use essay as a strong support of my point. Because essay is more formal than information from internet. Not only western but also other country will I seek. I think that different  races, society, culture have different opinion about premarital cohabitation. Compare them, and I can know more about the factors of approval and disapproval. It is benefit for my point.

    Eva & Vicky
     Their topic which talks about whether men should watch adult videos when they have girlfriends is very interesting and novel. Vicky approve it; while Eva disapprove it. In their annotation 1 and 2, they find many sources such as 洪蘭's research. I think their topic is a little similar to my topic. The outcome will differ from country to country. So their annotation 3 and 4 can search information from other country.  What's more, it is better if they have media source which could support their opinion.